Tag Archives: universal healthcare

Forgotten facts about healthcare


healthcare

FORGOTTEN FACTS ABOUT HEALTHCARE

1)      Healthcare is not like other forms of insurance. You cannot buy it by the slice. Everyone needs full coverage because no one knows what might happen.

2)      Healthcare can be immensely expensive. Any health care issue can potentially cost one hundred thousand or even one million dollars.

3)      Any form of “medical savings plans” is simply a cruel joke. For people living paycheck-to-paycheck any form of savings is impossible. A more affluent middle class family may be able to save five thousand dollars over five years in their medical savings plan. When and if they are hit by a medical crisis such as a heart attack, traffic accident, or severe disease, their five thousand dollars in savings may not cover even the first day of treatment.

4)      There has to be enough money paid in to the health care system to pay all claims. A sixty-year-old woman may say that she does not need pregnancy coverage. If that is allowed, then a twenty-year-old woman may say that she does not need coverage for “old people’s” issues such as osteoporosis or Alzheimer’s. Any medical care system must find a way to pay for all medical needs for all people. Healthcare is not just about my medical needs, but how to cover the medical needs of the whole population.

5)      Any health care plan will require government subsidies. The only alternative is to let the poor and vulnerable people die. People in nursing homes are there for a reason, and cannot be expected to get a job and support themselves.

6)      Even the healthiest people need insurance. You may be a marathon runner but this does not mean that you won’t get hit by a bus or develop a brain tumor.

7)      The cost of healthcare is not only the cost of the medical premiums, but also includes the deductibles and copays. A “cheap” insurance policy with low premiums is nearly worthless if it has high out-of-pocket costs. Many who complained about the Affordable Care Act went from cheap, nearly worthless policies, to full coverage. That is also a part of the reason that costs increased.

8)      Coverage of pre-existing conditions is essential. With anyone over age 50 you would expect numerous pre-existing conditions. Under recent plans announced by the Republican Congress, some people with pre-existing conditions would be paying in excess of $100,000 in health insurance premiums alone, before counting the costs of deductibles and copays. This is not insurance coverage but a death sentence. 

9)      We need wellness care instead of sick care. Wellness care involves vaccines, early diagnosis, and rapid intervention. Health care plans should focus on preventive care as a long-term investment. Preventive care should be done with out-of-pocket expense to the patients. Even better is to make preventative care free. For example, my Kaiser Permanente provider requested that I have a colonoscopy simply because of my age. This procedure was done without any out-of-pocket cost to me. During this procedure polyps were found and removed, preventing potential colon cancer.

10)   Healthcare should be seen as an investment in our human capital. A strong and healthy population yields productive workers and tax payers. Prevention is infinitely cheaper than emergency intervention and rehabilitation. 

11)   The health care system in most developed countries try to reduce overall healthcare costs by such mechanisms as volume discounts in purchasing. This country has gone to the opposite extreme. When Medicare Part D was pass for prescription coverage, Big Pharma was guaranteed that the government would pay top dollar for every purchase. The purpose was not to provide affordable health care to all Americans on Medicare. Rather, it was done to create a massive subsidy to Big Pharma at the expense of those in need.

Health Care Crisis in the US


Health Care Issues

The Unites States spends 17% of GDP on healthcare, or over $8,400 per capita, more than any other nation.  No other developed country spends more than 12% of GDP on medical care. And yet our people have some of the poorest healthcare outcomes in the developed world.  Some 46 million Americans are uninsured.  We rank 30th in infant mortality.  Our life expectancy is 50th in the world, behind all developed nations.  Medical expensed is a major factor in 62% of personal bankruptcies.

Spending so much to get so little.

CLICK ON GRAPH TO ENLARGE

Truly we are not getting the maximum value for our health care expenditures.

We need to have universal access to healthcare.  This does not need to be accomplished through a government bureaucracy, but it does need to be done.

Universal healthcare will provide for early diagnosis and intervention, saving billions of dollars in the long run.  As it is now, people without access to health care normally wait until their condition requires emergency room treatment at high cost.  They are forced to wait until their minor medical issues become crises before their conditions can be treated.

Under the current health care system medical care is delayed for those who can least afford it.  Imagine a small child with an earache.  The parent is forced to delay medicalcare due to the high cost of treatment, let’s say $200 for a doctor visit, lab tests, and prescriptions.  Without access to healthcare the child’s condition worsens until the child is taken to the emergency room with a high fever and unbearable pain.  Because of the delay a relatively minor malady that could be treated for a few hundred dollars may now cost thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars.  And on top of this, the child may have become deaf or suffered other permanent impairment requiring a lifetime of special care.

Single payer health care will end the costly paperwork and delays caused by our current multiple-payer system.  Health care professionals would be able to concentrate on providing health care as opposed to figuring out who is going to pay and how to prepare and submit the paperwork for reimbursement.

Pre-existing conditions will no longer be an issue as all will have insurance regardless of their condition.  Everyone can be covered if everyone pays.

Universal healthcare will focus on prevention and early intervention.  Vaccines, blood pressure monitoring, diabetes testing, cancer screening, health education, weight control, nutrition and exercise, stop smoking campaigns, and perinatal care will become essential programs for maintaining health and wellness, and for reducing healthcare costs in the long run. Under universal healthcare the focus will shift from disease care to wellness care.

We need a fundamental shift in priorities for healthcare.  Under our current system, approximately 75% of a person’s health care expense comes in the final year of life.  Instead of paying for heroic measures to extend life of the critically ill, we need to shift our resources and our focus towards maintaining health and wellness for all.  In the most extreme cases, our heroic measures do not extend life, but only prolong death at a horrific cost.  Those are healthcare dollars that could better be invested elsewhere.

Healthcare rationing will be required under any conceivable healthcare system.  The old indemnity insurance system failed because plan members could demand essentially unlimited medical coverage.  If the first doctor refused to do a requested procedure, the patient could seek out ten additional doctors, and undergo ten more sets of tests.  Eventually, a doctor would agree to do the procedure, even if it had limited or no justifiable medical value.  And the result was that the insurance company was expected to pay the full cost of the search for treatment as well as the actual treatment.

It is not financially possible to perform all of the medical procedures that we know how to do.  Nor is that always the wisest course of action.  The cost of heroic medical care is paid not only in scarce healthcare dollars, but in pain, incapacity and suffering of the patient as well.  The cost of intensive care is approximately $3,000 per day.

If the patient in such circumstances has a chance of recovery, then the expense as well as the pain and suffering may well be worth it.  But if the patient has no chance of recovery, then what is gained by the expense, pain and suffering? And in gauging the capacity for recovery we must use sober reasoning and not wishful thinking.

But we must also look at the negative quality of life for the patient.  If a patient has no chance of recovery, how long should they be maintained by such heroic means?  And furthermore, what is the quality of life for that patient?  This situation demonstrates the difference between extending life and merely delaying clinical death.  The irony is that under such extreme circumstances we treat our pets more humanely than we treat our parents.

Before making any major medical decisions we must also consider other factors such as the patient’s age, health, his or her capacity to endure the procedure, and the potential for improvement in quality of life that the procedure offers.  For example, an eighty-six year old with congestive heart failure ought not to be considered for a liver transplant.